digital slr?

Dec 25, 2007 by Karyzma77 | Posted in Photography

I'm relatively of a newbie to cameras, but not as much as some. I possess several point and shoot cameras, no digital slr's.

what stigmatize,make or model do you suggest to purchase,and why? I'm looking in the climax of $700 before tax range.

I was somewhat interested in the nikon d40x and the canon nonconformist xti (or something like that).

What are your thoughts?

Let me labourers you sort out the monotony that comes with buying a DSLR.

Someone suggested the Sony Alpha or the Pentax K100D, citing the in-camera give the slip to reduction. This would be a plus, but is categorically only a selling point. In truth, this distress reduction only provides around 2 stops modification. Also, on the Pentax K100D, this sucks to a different place the battery life on a camera that runs on AA batteries. Yes, this is the alone DSLR that runs on AA's, and hopefully liking remain so. You see, the battery life is severely cut, giving you only hither 400 pictures before they communicate out. My thing with the Sony Alpha are its smaller amount than good image quality at higher ISO's, and its propensity to over saturate.

The Nikon D40x is an excellent camera for the flush, and the best bang for your buck in its descent; a title once held by Canon and the Digital Freedom fighter series. The Nikon D40x has great image grade, excellent build and layout, and a supurb voting for of lenses. Granted, non AF-S lenses will not sedan focus. The reason being, Nikon took out the in camera motor. This seems like a vital flaw, but when you think about it, it categorically was not. The Nikon D40 and D40x are designed for people who are moving up from consideration and shoots, who do not have any previous Nikkors, and who do not organize to buy any besides the 18-55mm kit or the 55-200mm extended kit. This is equally why these cameras cannot be found with out the kit 18-55mm. This does not sordid you cannot use the older screw driven Nikkors. You can stock-still get that great quality, only you'll play a joke on to manual focus the lens. This sucks, I be informed, but it's easy to get use to. Besides, photographers have been enchiridion focusing their lenses for well to the ground a hundred years, and they continue to do this today; look at the $1000 Canon 65mm 1x-5 macro: http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/contro ller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=15 5&modelid=7325 Yes, it's a enchiridion focus, and a great lens, both optically and its all uses. A moment ago look at it...!

The Nikon D40x, like all Nikon cameras is unusually well built. This goes from the $550 D40 to the $5,000 D3. This has held sincerely all the way back in the days of film. Canon on the other speedily always feels "Cheap", that is plasticy and flimsy. I don't care what anyone says, but the Digital Recusant series, the Rebel, the XT and the XTi all feel terrible. The 40D is much better, but undisturbed feels like a Canon-light and Scrooge-like. It really only really goes to a different place with the supurb EOS 5D and the Mark series.

One other affair that bring down Canon are its lenses. Dissimilar to Nikon, whose lenses are stunning, Canon suffers from some visual flaws. Now, I love the way Canon USM lenses look and note, but this is about it. Really, the optical distinction does not get good until you lay out around $500. But the L series is where the visual quality become flawless.

Overall, I would intimate the Nikon D40x. For so cheap and such great blue blood, why would you want to miss it? For Canon, you'll possess to spend a lot more money to get the same prominence. If you go with Canon, at least get the 40D and a good lens. In another manner, you'll be disapointed.

From what you've read, I force sound one sided with Nikon. Let me at most say, this is how I feel, and from my own experiences with both Canon, Nikon, and Sony, Pentax, Mamiya, and others. If I use a Nikon, I separate I get quality. If I use a Canon 5D and an L lens, I know I get calibre as well. I would be crazy to say Canon is a bad band, as I would to say Nikon is. In truth, both place excellent products.

Hope this helps.